<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Technical Term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dervala.net/2001/11/29/a-technical-term/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dervala.net/2001/11/29/a-technical-term/</link>
	<description>A love letter</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://dervala.net/2001/11/29/a-technical-term/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2004 06:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dervala.net/?p=10#comment-4</guid>
		<description>PS  Sorry, the Pope and Natlie Wood were all I could come up with at the time.  I had a most interesting English professor as an undergraduate and would have included Dr. Bunge, but that would have made any sense to you so I left him out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS  Sorry, the Pope and Natlie Wood were all I could come up with at the time.  I had a most interesting English professor as an undergraduate and would have included Dr. Bunge, but that would have made any sense to you so I left him out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://dervala.net/2001/11/29/a-technical-term/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2004 06:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dervala.net/?p=10#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The depth of your good humor and your understanding of it make you ineligible as a cartoon character.  Anyone portraying you in that role has a limited ability in perceiving the character of others.  I dont see it as possible.  I also dont see it as a personality defect, if thats any consolation.

I also don't see GWB (Shrub II) as a cartoon character, albeit for  opposite reasons.

I'm probably wrong in both cases, but it strikes me that even Bugs Bunny has some character in his makeup, but when you have just a bit too much, say like the Pope or Natalie Wood (love of my life as a teenager), then you're essentially ineligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The depth of your good humor and your understanding of it make you ineligible as a cartoon character.  Anyone portraying you in that role has a limited ability in perceiving the character of others.  I dont see it as possible.  I also dont see it as a personality defect, if thats any consolation.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see <span class="caps">GWB</span> (Shrub II) as a cartoon character, albeit for  opposite reasons.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably wrong in both cases, but it strikes me that even Bugs Bunny has some character in his makeup, but when you have just a bit too much, say like the Pope or Natalie Wood (love of my life as a teenager), then you&#8217;re essentially ineligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

