<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awright?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dervala.net/2003/11/25/awright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dervala.net/2003/11/25/awright/</link>
	<description>A love letter</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: India</title>
		<link>http://dervala.net/2003/11/25/awright/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dervala.net/?p=495#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what the rest of the country's excuse is, but in New York City I suspect we use the word _produce_ because we're not quite sure where fruits and vegetables come from. I mean, they can't _really_ grow on trees and out of the dirt, like all the picture books say they do, right? Somebody had to produce them somewhere, in a factory. Like, let's be realistic here for a minute . . .
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the rest of the country&#8217;s excuse is, but in New York City I suspect we use the word <em>produce</em> because we&#8217;re not quite sure where fruits and vegetables come from. I mean, they can&#8217;t <em>really</em> grow on trees and out of the dirt, like all the picture books say they do, right? Somebody had to produce them somewhere, in a factory. Like, let&#8217;s be realistic here for a minute . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dervala</title>
		<link>http://dervala.net/2003/11/25/awright/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Dervala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dervala.net/?p=495#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Nice one.

But bagels could be "boiled goods". Freedom fries could be "fried goods". 

It would match the formal usages that Americans sometimes go for--"apparel" instead of "clothes", "produce" (pronounced strangely) instead of "fruit and vegetables". When I moved to New York these oddities were the hardest to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one.</p>
<p>But bagels could be &#8220;boiled goods&#8221;. Freedom fries could be &#8220;fried goods&#8221;. </p>
<p>It would match the formal usages that Americans sometimes go for&#8212;&#8220;apparel&#8221; instead of &#8220;clothes&#8221;, &#8220;produce&#8221; (pronounced strangely) instead of &#8220;fruit and vegetables&#8221;. When I moved to New York these oddities were the hardest to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose</title>
		<link>http://dervala.net/2003/11/25/awright/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dervala.net/?p=495#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Because boiled and fried are not good.

Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because boiled and fried are not good.</p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

